LiteSpeed vs Apache: Which one is better

Litespeed Hosting Price And Plans


Choose Plan
  • Free Domain Name
  • 4 GB Web Space
  • 80 GB Data Transfer
  • 10 Email Addresses
  • 512 MB RAM (pMEM)
  • 8 Concurrent connections (EP)
  • 20 processes (nPROC)
  • 1 MB/s I/O
  • Free Website Builder
  • Addon Domain 1
  • No SSH Access


Choose Plan
  • Free Domain Name
  • 8 GB Web Space
  • 150 GB Data Transfer
  • 15 Email Addresses
  • 512 MB RAM (pMEM)
  • 10 Concurrent connections (EP)
  • 25 processes (nPROC)
  • 1MB/s I/O
  • Free Website Builder
  • Addon Domain 2
  • No SSH Access


Choose Plan
  • Free Domain Name
  • 20 GB Web Space
  • 400 GB Data Transfer
  • 20 Email Addresses
  • 512 MB RAM (pMEM)
  • 15 Concurrent connections (EP)
  • 35 processes (nPROC)
  • 1MB/s I/O
  • Free Website Builder
  • Addon Domain 3
  • No SSH Access


Choose Plan
  • Free Domain Name
  • 30 GB Disk & 600GB Transfer
  • FREE LSWS Manager
  • 30 Email Addresses
  • 756 MB RAM (pMEM)
  • 20 Concurrent connections (EP)
  • 40 processes (nPROC)
  • 1.5MB/s I/O
  • Free Website Builder
  • Addon Domain 4


Choose Plan
  • Free Domain Name
  • 40 Gb Web Space & 1 Tb Transfer
  • FREE LSWS Manager
  • Unlimited Email Addresses
  • 1 GB RAM (pMEM)
  • 45 Concurrent connections (EP)
  • 50 processes (nPROC)
  • 1.5MB/s I/O
  • Free Website Builder
  • Addon Domain 5

It is decided that the website calls for Domain and Web Hosting, whichever niche online business or an internet presence, a user fancy. Depending on the website launching location, you can get the servers from Web hosting in Melbourne and Web hosting in Pakistan or wherever you prefer your host to be. Of course, you should never compromise the quality of the services, so exploring the top hosting company is the right approach. That is how you can ensure reliable serversmaximum uptimefast loading, etc. That being said, the following undertaking turns out the be the Web Server for the hosting servers. So here we have compared the top two competing web servers: LiteSpeed vs Apache.

Heading down, you will get to know which one is getting more acknowledgment in 2022. If it is Apache, hosting companies are already relying on it. Nevertheless, if it is LiteSpeed, then LiteSpeed Hosting should be the potential track.

Apache Web Server & Litespeed Web Server – Outline & Difference 

Both Apache and LiteSpeed (LS) are web server software; HTTP Servers. In simple words, these are the web server applications that understand the Web and deliver web-based content over the internet, for instance, HTML pages, multimedia, and CSS Style sheets.

Apache has a module-based structure, while LiteSpeed has event-driven architecture. Another difference between LiteSpeed and Apache is the former is commercial while the latter is free.

While searching about LiteSpeed, you will read that it is a drop-in replacement to Apache almost everywhere. Moreover, the best part is LiteSpeed’s complete compatibility with the Apache. So the hosting environments that are using Apache Web Server can easily switch to LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) without altering the Operating System (OS) details or any other programs.

Users can acquire the LiteSpeed benefits by purchasing the Fast LiteSpeed Web Server from a reputable LiteSpeed web hosting provider.

Now let’s start with the LiteSpeed vs Apache comparison.

Who is more Popular & Older in the market?

Apache came into being in April 1995, and in the shortest span, it got spread over the Web server market. On the other side, Litespeed has been around since July 2003. However, it got the spotlight in recent years, to be more precise, two years.

As a matter of fact, Apache has long run, wielded the power of being the widely used web server. However, now it seems to be facing decline primarily due to performance issues and a lack of solutions. Not only this but also LiteSpeed being emerged as the best alternative, has strongly influenced Apache’s popularity.

Furthermore, Apache has a market share of more or less 31.2%, while LiteSpeed stood at 12.0%, which is far less than the former.

So although Apache is much older and has been widespread, LiteSpeed is replacing it. So LiteSpeed will win the popularity game in 2022.

Operating System Compatibility 

Currently, two well-established operating systems are Linux and Windows, with Linux having more users. Individuals can pick out any of them; however, it is different when it comes to web servers, LiteSpeed vs Apache. Apache is compatible with Linux and all of its distributions, including Ubuntu, RedHat, etc. Also, it supports the Windows OS too. In contrast, LiteSpeed supports only Linux and all of its existing OS versions but isn’t compatible with Windows.


Concerning performance, the capability can vary as websites have to render both the static content (rarely changes) and dynamic content (changes per user request), and users sometimes come with unique requests and occasionally similar. 

However, Apache has to run a lot of modules, and it executes a new process chain for each visitor. And it continues for as much time as the visitor is present on the website, regardless of the condition that it is requesting the resources or not. That, in the end, increases the load time and causes massive consumption of server resources. Though modules like FastCGI and PHP-FPM are here to help with pre-configuration in a many-user PHP environment. It makes Apache handle higher loads and speed up the pages. However, even this solution can fail for large traffic sites, and seasonal traffic flows.

Now the second one of LiteSpeed Server vs Apache.

On the other hand, LiteSpeed employs server-level caching, and its event-driven architecture can easily cater to thousands of requests without eating up the resources.

Also, Fast LiteSpeed Web Server is currently the one and only Web Server to fully support HTTP/3 so that it can ensure perfect client-server interaction. In simple words, it serves the content (text, images, video) in streams instead of pieces from its compressed cache files in response to the user’s browser requests. That also means that it doesn’t have to create new request(s) each time for the same or different user and knows how to handle requests from multi-users/ browsers. So, eventually, it can make faster loadings come true and not eat up the resources.

In short, LiteSpeed serves the content (static/dynamic) as needed, unlike the Apache serving everything whether the users request or not. Therefore, LiteSpeed notches up the performance score.

LiteSpeed vs Apache – Who is faster?

Speed and performance categories are almost alike, but in some cases, they are not. Besides, one of the most typed queries on Google about LiteSpeed is “Is Litespeed faster than Apache?” So let us answer this question too.

Thanks to its smart caching, the LiteSpeed Web Server is much faster than ApacheLiteSpeed web hosting is ideal for getting that speed for your website.

To be precise, LiteSpeed can be up to six times faster than Apache for static content without draining the server resources. While for dynamic content, both Web Servers can be on the same page if Apache uses some of its modules.


For WordPress 

World Wide Web has a large number of WordPress sites (also other CMSs too), so PHP applications are in abundance. Regarding LiteSpeed Web Server vs Apache for WP sites:


Apache is as good as any other web server for WordPress. However, LiteSpeed again leads the game because of its ability to increase the server’s PHP performance by 50%. WordPress (written in PHP) will definitely excel when PHP performance is skyrocketed. So LiteSpeed Hosting can be perfect for WordPress sites.

LiteSpeed Web Server’s LSPHP couples the connection of PHP applications to the Web Server because of its (LSAPI + PHP) command line mode to process PHP scripts running on a remote server. Besides, LiteSpeed Cache (LSCache) can be of much assistance as an all-in-one acceleration plugin. It uses LiteSpeed Web Server’s built-in server-level cache as its base and shortens the server stack to streamline fastness in content delivery.



Apache has an excellent module, mod_security, to protect your website from various attacks. However, Apache is said to have security issues because of its permission for configuration modification to the individuals.

So to take care of this and other issues, you can practice some viable approaches. For instance, one can have security optimizations, block user access, remove unnecessary modules deletion, latest safety updates, patches, etc.

In contrast, LiteSpeed has built-in protections from DDoS attacks by featuring bandwidth and connection throttling. It also supports Apache’s mod_security, so Web Application Firewall (WAF) helps strengthen server defences. One study/ test reveals that LiteSpeed servers can easily handle the same number of requests that unfortunately made an Apache Web Server crash previously. So LiteSpeed web hosting can be the ultimate choice for a secure hosting environment.

Thus, it’s a win for LSWS in openlitespeed vs Apache for security.

Shared Hosting Environments 

While Apache is indeed in use for many years whether, for shared environmentsVPS, or dedicated ones, its lagging performance can cause issues for shared users and admins.


Admittedly, cPanel, CloudLinux, etc., are prevalent among hosting users and administrators. But, in fact, users nowadays prefer cPanel Hosting and other software-oriented hosting platforms to perfectly manage the site’s backend and get the most out of their spent dollars.

So LiteSpeed, in conjunction with the CloudLinux OS, delivers much faster speeds and manages the virtual resources shared among the users.

Moreover, LiteSpeed accompanies cPanel, whether related to a new location server or scalability. As a result, there are no headaches of setup delays or security risks for custom configurations of the server with LiteSpeed Hosting.


Apache wins around the LiteSpeed vs Apache WordPress cost contest. Plenty of Apache projects and products are freebies; anyone can download them. So Apache HTTP Server has always been free of charge, being an open-source software.

Indicating the price factor as one of the possible benchmarks over other web servers, web server managers usually prefer it. However, many companies charge for providing and licensing with modified or straightforward environments. So without any restriction, users can download the Apache free of cost from the official website. On the other hand, LiteSpeed is proprietary web server software.

So you will come across a total of 8 plans of licensing in which the ‘Starter’ is Free (Open LiteSpeed), and the rest are premium. The lowest plan comes at $ 10/ month, while the highest comes at $ 92/ month. Also, with the yearly billing cycle, there can be discounts, and one month will be free. In addition to these, there are owned licenses for a one-year plan as well, starting from a $ 464 one-time payment to $ 1999 for the highest plan.

LiteSpeed Web Server vs Apache – Customer Support 

Apache has detailed documentation to resolve the issues. Nonetheless, if it isn’t working, you can ask for support via email. That being said, it has various email addresses based on the area of inquiry to let the users contact the right help for the respective issue. However, the Apache Foundation advised not to waste the experts’ time and do the complete homework before asking for help.

However, LiteSpeed has three types of support. General support, premium support, and ticketing system. The first type includes detailed documentation, guides/ explanations, forums, live chat with the user community, and blogs. While in the second, you can receive immediate and specialized support from the professionals and development core team.

On purchasing the LiteSpeed Hosting, you can also expect dedicated assistance from your host.

Final Verdict!

From the above LiteSpeed vs Apache discussion, LiteSpeed is definitely the winner for being the best web server in 2022. You can also try Fast LiteSpeed Web Server from a leading Web hosting company in london.